• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

Currently in a 3+ player game, if a player is skipped, other will be counted as tie. So those low ELO player will be more positive to kick player, and those high ELO player sometimes can't get any ELO even he's near to win, just because someone was outtimed.
I suggest that when someone is skipped, only that player have to give ELO to other player, other player's ELO doesn't change because of the tie.
For example, in a 4 player game, A was outtimed, then A-B, A-C, A-D count as A lose and ELO changes, but B-C, B-D, C-D shouldn't make the ELO change because it's not a true tie.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?