Todos los informes
Informes de Zookeepers
#124258: "No actions"
implemented: Esta sugerencia ya ha sido implementada
1
¿Sobre qué es este informe?
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
Sugerencia: en mi opinión, esta idea puede mejorar mucho la implementación del juego
Descripción detallada
-
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
My opponent was somehow able click his way into a situation when he had 0 resources AND he fired all the keepers along with the animals that he had saved, thus leaving him with no means of gaining more resources.
I am sure all the moves were legal and nobody would probably do that in a physical game, but in a digital game a player can be left with essential no moves.
An option will be a warning before a player discard their last keeper with saved animals?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v125
Historial de informes
18 may 2024 7:21 • parsonii • Esta sugerencia aún no ha sido analizada por los desarrolladores:
18 may 2024 17:13 • Fearinn • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
We've antecipated this scenario. It should've been blocked by an error, so this is actually a bug. I'm gonna investigate it, thanks!
18 may 2024 20:15 • Fearinn • Esta sugerencia ya ha sido implementada:
After some investigation, I'm almost certain there was no bug. What most likely happened is that your opponent quit the match when he had 1 resource in hand. When a player quits, all their resources are returned to the bag. As his turns will be automatically skipped, there would be no actions anyway.
I've just added a message to make it more clear when that's the case.
Please let me know if you have any info that indicates I'm wrong.
I've just added a message to make it more clear when that's the case.
Please let me know if you have any info that indicates I'm wrong.
18 may 2024 20:43 • parsonii • Esta sugerencia ya ha sido implementada:
You are right. He did have one resource remaining when he quit the game. But one white resource would not allow him to save an animal and he had no means of gaining more resources to get himself out of that situation.
I am really thinking more along the line that the game needs to have a situation that will prevent that or some mechanism for a player to potentially dig themselves out of that hole. Maybe gain min 1 resource or a rule that a player may not discard the last keeper with animal saved.
In either case, it's more a game mechanism than the implementation. Thank you for looking into it. :)
I am really thinking more along the line that the game needs to have a situation that will prevent that or some mechanism for a player to potentially dig themselves out of that hole. Maybe gain min 1 resource or a rule that a player may not discard the last keeper with animal saved.
In either case, it's more a game mechanism than the implementation. Thank you for looking into it. :)
18 may 2024 22:39 • Fearinn • Esta sugerencia ya ha sido implementada:
One white resource would allow him to save an animal, due to the conservation fund rule (1 white = 2 red/green). As long as the implementation works as expected, the players will never become unable to continue the match.
That doesn't mean they can't put themselves in very bad situations, but I guess that's part of the game.
That doesn't mean they can't put themselves in very bad situations, but I guess that's part of the game.
Agregar a este informe
Por favor agrega aquí cualquier cosa que sea relevante para reproducir este error o entender tu sugerencia:
- Otro ID de partida / ID de jugada
- ¿Se resolvió el problema al pulsar F5?
- ¿Apareció el problema varias veces? ¿Cada vez? ¿Aleatoriamente?
- Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
