• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?