#149942: "Assign Losses Automatically"

• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
(Not a bug, just a suggestion.) Currently the game pauses a lot to ask folks to pick which unit will take a loss in battle. But (unless I'm missing something) actually there's no need to do this in most cases because it's usually determined which type of unit has to take the loss, and there's no functional difference between different units in the same category. There are some times where players do have decisions to make, e.g. whether a highland or a non-Highland Metropolitan brigade will take a loss. But there's basically never a reason to take a loss on a Highland rather than another Metropolitan brigade, so even though this is technically a choice I don't think it needs to be on here when it'd slow things down. Which Indian unit to take as a loss sometimes does matter, e.g. in a multi-Year scenario you should preferably take as a loss a unit whose Village is going to be occupied at the start of next Year. So it'd be great to streamline this a bit. Also I'm not sure if the implementation currently always requires you to take losses on an already flipped unit, but 13.4 is clear that Reduced units have loss priority over Full in the same category, so that also removes the need for some decisions.

Thanks so much!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v131

¿Sobre qué es este informe?

¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes

¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes

Por favor, comprueba si ya hay un informe sobre el mismo tema

Descripción detallada

Historial de informes

Agregar a este informe

Cambiar el estado del informe a:

Ayuda

Contribuir

Síguenos