#161133: "Didn't agree about dead stones, resumed play, then game didn't count dead stones."

• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
No errors, the game simply ended without allowing use to mark the dead stones. The game didn't identify the dead stones correctly, and didn't even ask if we agreed with the counting result. As several stones were not marked as dead, I lost the stones and the territory they were in.

In my recent table, #642822106, my opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", which almost cost me the game. This violates the rules of the game.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Firefox v133.0.3