• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de pantalla de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar un servicio de hospedaje de imágenes a tu elección (snipboard.io, por ejemplo) para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí. ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de pantalla de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar un servicio de hospedaje de imágenes a tu elección (snipboard.io, por ejemplo) para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de pantalla de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar un servicio de hospedaje de imágenes a tu elección (snipboard.io, por ejemplo) para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí. ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

I participated in a Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=366115) and finished with two victories and two defeats, exactly as user darthdalek did. I wondered why she was declared third winner of the tournament and I was given only 4th place when we had the same results. When I asked support about this, Emma from the support team told me "ties are broken randomly by the algorythm". I think this is ridiculous, as it could easily be changed. In such cases, you could give both players a reward for the third place, for example. If you prefer only one player in each rank, there are several tie breakers possible. In this tournament everyone played against everyone, so you could look at the direct comparison between two tied players. I won against darthdalek, so I proved I was a better player than her! Alternatively, you could choose the player who needed less moves or less time, if you want to. Everything would be better than letting the algorythm decide randomly.
In another Giraffe Raffe tournament (boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=375146) the same problem occured again: user Cyclope and I had 13 victories and one defeat each. He was declared winner of the tournament and I only second. And once again, I had defeated him, so I proved better! This is really frustrating.
I see this can't be changed for past tournaments, but it has to be changed for future ones.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?