#169599: "Part scores not accumulating in Chicago"
¿Sobre qué es este informe?
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
Por favor, comprueba si ya hay un informe sobre el mismo tema
Si es así, por favor VOTA por este informe. ¡A los informes con más votos se les da PRIORIDAD!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descripción detallada
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
-
• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó
At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
-
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
-
• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?
At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
-
• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?
At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.
-
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
-
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
-
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
Historial de informes
- The original scoring is very messy, especially considering tiebreakers.
BGA does not recommend allowing ties in team games due to its ELO modifier design.
- The part score was gradually replaced by Duplicate Bridge scoring, after all.
Agregar a este informe
- Otro ID de partida / ID de jugada
- ¿Se resolvió el problema al pulsar F5?
- ¿Apareció el problema varias veces? ¿Cada vez? ¿Aleatoriamente?
- Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
