#21478: "Technology setup bug"
¿Sobre qué es este informe?
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
Por favor, comprueba si ya hay un informe sobre el mismo tema
Si es así, por favor VOTA por este informe. ¡A los informes con más votos se les da PRIORIDAD!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Descripción detallada
• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó
N/A• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
N/A• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?
N/A• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?
N/A• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema (cuál era la instrucción actual del juego)?
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
N/A• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
N/A• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
I've played seventy-one games of Teotihuacan on BGA and have noticed that the technologies that cost two gold never appear on the top row (and, vice versa, the one-gold technologies never appear on the bottom row).
The instructions state that six of the nine technologies should be randomly selected and then placed in ascending numerical order. This means that all four of the one-gold technologies could be used in a game and thus one of them (#07) would be placed on the bottom row. Also, all five of the two-gold technologies could be used and thus two of them (#09 and #11) would be placed on the top row.
Perhaps a bug in the code is causing the problem. Could you please allow the one-gold technologies to be placed in the bottom row and the two-gold technologies to be placed in the top row? Doing so will allow for greater replay value and new, exciting gameplay. Thank you!• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Mozilla v5
Historial de informes
It appears to be as the report describes.
The code first chooses one of the 1-gold tiles to exclude, and places the remaining ones in row 1.
Then it chooses two of the 2-gold tiles to exclude, and places the remaining ones in row 2.
Instead it should do something like the following:
* Select 6 tiles, and sort them.
* Place the first 3 tiles in row 1.
* Place the last 3 tiles in row 2.
github.com/salty-horse/bga-teotihuacan/commit/bug_21478
I'm working on a fix.
Agregar a este informe
- Otro ID de partida / ID de jugada
- ¿Se resolvió el problema al pulsar F5?
- ¿Apareció el problema varias veces? ¿Cada vez? ¿Aleatoriamente?
- Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.