#37521: "Is it ok to mislead the other players through the chat? "
¿Sobre qué es este informe?
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
Por favor, comprueba si ya hay un informe sobre el mismo tema
Si es así, por favor VOTA por este informe. ¡A los informes con más votos se les da PRIORIDAD!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descripción detallada
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
-
• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó
It's about the activity from chat!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
-
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
It's about the activity from chat!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
-
• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?
It's about the activity from chat!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
-
• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?
It's about the activity from chat!
-
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
-
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
It's about the activity from chat!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
-
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
It's about the activity from chat!
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
-
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
I thought the chat is about greeting the other players or to discuss general things outside the game. NOT talking about the cards you discovered as an individual player. In this game I've played the other players keep writing things like:
- right after they played a map card they wrote imediately what they saw under, eg. "middle is gold" or "bottom is coal". Sometimes they were right (when they were the gold miner) but also they were false (the saboteur)
- they ask what is under the map card when other player used this card
- who they think is the saboteur...
When you play face-to-face you only GUESS those informations (and you play acordingly) but you DON'T offer / share FACTS!
And I don't understand why this is acceptable for the online version.
Excerpts from the rules:
- Deal one card to each player, who looks at it and puts it face down in front of him WITHOUT REVEALING HIS ROLE TO THE OTHER PLAYERS. (Setup)
- The members of each group should work together, but often they CAN ONLY GUESS who their allies are! [... ] But, the identity of each dwarf is not revealed until the gold is split up. (Object of the Game)
So, in the original rules is NOTHING about misleading ON PURPOSE the others.
Is it ok?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v89
Historial de informes
EugeneLiapin dream team 12:47 PM
red is sub 12:47 PM
EugeneLiapinno sub? 12:52 PM
EugeneLiapin what is up? 12:53 PM
ANDN r u serios? 12:54 PM
Liza Fox Patronus What's the top? 12:54 PM
EugeneLiapin what is on top> 12:54 PM
ANDN i don't think this is how we have to play 12:55 PM
EugeneLiapin this is exately how to play 12:55 PM
where schould we dig? 12:55 PM
ANDN i'll investigate the rules! 12:56 PM
EugeneLiapin good luck with that 12:56 PM
...
EugeneLiapin i think yellow is sub 01:18 PM
ANDN i think you are and i also think you play against the rules! 01:19 PM
EugeneLiapin gosh 01:19 PM
check the rules 01:19 PM
ANDN i will. i don't think you are allowed to mislead the other players by this chat. 01:20 PM
EugeneLiapin i am not mislead anyone 01:20 PM
i communicate 01:20 PM
that is the point of the game 01:20 PM
Liza Fox Patronus Top is gold, guys. Anyone who is not a saboteur, please, help to find it 01:20 PM
lailaion Fix me please 01:21 PM
EugeneLiapin yellow, i think you dont get the point of the game, but l do like your style 01:22 PM
i just get the whole bunch of good mood 01:22 PM
thank you, my friend 01:22 PM
Because it would make no sense to allow a player to declare having a role he does not have, without allowing the players to claim the role corresponding to the card received.
When it comes to banning verbal exchanges between players, that would have nothing to do with the rule that says nothing about it.
I suppose that Saboteur was extensively tested before being marketed, and a negligence of the author on an issue as essential as the exchange of information between players seems to me excluded in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Agregar a este informe
- Otro ID de partida / ID de jugada
- ¿Se resolvió el problema al pulsar F5?
- ¿Apareció el problema varias veces? ¿Cada vez? ¿Aleatoriamente?
- Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
