Todos los informes
Informes de Wizard
#44827: "Added new game length options for Wizard (more balance, more benefits)"
implemented: Esta sugerencia ya ha sido implementada
28
¿Sobre qué es este informe?
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
Sugerencia: en mi opinión, esta idea puede mejorar mucho la implementación del juego
Descripción detallada
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
If I have 10~15 minutes to play the game.
I think "Amigo Championship Rules" needs more time, and "5 Rounds" loses the value of the game .
"Amigo Champion Rules" takes 25~35 minutes to play.
"Round 5" is just to feel the game, luck is more important.
It is suggested to add a game length option.
a. 7 rounds (1~7 rounds)
b. odd rounds (1.3.5.7.9.11.13.15)
c. customized?
c-1. (1.3.5.11.13.15)
c-2. (1.5.8.11.15)
If there are more game length options, it can allow more players who only have a little time to play the game.• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v91
Historial de informes
abcdd2829 • Esta sugerencia aún no ha sido analizada por los desarrolladores:
14 jul 2021 2:14 • clone from boardgamearena.com/bug?id=44791
Berlas • Esta sugerencia aún no ha sido analizada por los desarrolladores:
14 jul 2021 7:22 • Good idea to add the 7 rounds rule, but the arena rules should stick to 10 to nds as is
abcdd2829 • Esta sugerencia aún no ha sido analizada por los desarrolladores:
14 jul 2021 8:02 • Thanks,
I think more option for game length is good to play
I think more option for game length is good to play
MGoulet • Los desarrolladores desearían más información sobre esta sugerencia:
15 jul 2021 2:19 • Adding a 7 rounds is ok and pretty easy to do it (option A) since all configurations go up to 7 cards. But, adding 2 more rounds is what you really like (and vote for)? Maybe a configuration like 2 to 8 cards and skip the 1 card.
For option B, C-1 and C-2 it can be played in 3 or 4 players games (restrictive).
For option B, C-1 and C-2 it can be played in 3 or 4 players games (restrictive).
abcdd2829 • Los desarrolladores desearían más información sobre esta sugerencia:
15 jul 2021 3:46 • Hi MGoulet
My purpose is every player can enjoy game with "10~15 min"
Now "Round 5" is just to feel the game, luck is more important.(card less ,so difficult to reverse game)
I strongly want 1 round because of the "foresight" rule,so I think 7 rounds is most easily.
If I need more game fun, I may need more cards, if only 10~15 minutes, I think maybe
5~6 turn for 3~6 player
3 player (1.5.9.13.17.20)
4 player (1.4.7.10.13.15)
5 player (1.3.5.7.9.11.12)
6 player (1.3.5.7.9.10)
We all like to play this game, but a round takes a long time. I play "Round 5" most often. I often encounter an opponent who feels that the "fifth round" is unbalanced, but does not have more time to play the "Amigo Championship Rules".
Thanks
My purpose is every player can enjoy game with "10~15 min"
Now "Round 5" is just to feel the game, luck is more important.(card less ,so difficult to reverse game)
I strongly want 1 round because of the "foresight" rule,so I think 7 rounds is most easily.
If I need more game fun, I may need more cards, if only 10~15 minutes, I think maybe
5~6 turn for 3~6 player
3 player (1.5.9.13.17.20)
4 player (1.4.7.10.13.15)
5 player (1.3.5.7.9.11.12)
6 player (1.3.5.7.9.10)
We all like to play this game, but a round takes a long time. I play "Round 5" most often. I often encounter an opponent who feels that the "fifth round" is unbalanced, but does not have more time to play the "Amigo Championship Rules".
Thanks
abcdd2829 • Los desarrolladores desearían más información sobre esta sugerencia:
15 jul 2021 7:11 • Hi MGoulet
I think "7 rounds" is good to speed play(card is less), "customized" as follow is high efficiency to play(need more time).
Each has its own advantages
5~6 turn for 3~6 player
3 player (1.5.9.13.17.20)
4 player (1.4.7.10.13.15)
5 player (1.3.5.7.9.11.12)
6 player (1.3.5.7.9.10)
Thanks
I think "7 rounds" is good to speed play(card is less), "customized" as follow is high efficiency to play(need more time).
Each has its own advantages
5~6 turn for 3~6 player
3 player (1.5.9.13.17.20)
4 player (1.4.7.10.13.15)
5 player (1.3.5.7.9.11.12)
6 player (1.3.5.7.9.10)
Thanks
abcdd2829 • Los desarrolladores desearían más información sobre esta sugerencia:
17 jul 2021 4:48 • Hi MGoulet
Sorry to modify customized.
After I talk with other voting players, it may be revised as follows and it may not take more time.
imgur.com/ORu2M3U
all player need first turn for the "foresight" rule, last turn for "Jester".
3 player use "5 gap" add. (i.e. 1.6.11.16.20)
4 player use "4 gap" add. (i.e. 1.5.9.13.15)
5 player use "3 gap" add. (i.e. 1.4.7.10.12)
6 player use "2 gap" add. (i.e. 1.3.5.7.9.10) or (1.3.5.7.10)
3 player total use 162 cards (save 51% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
4 player total use 172 cards (save 53% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
5 player total use 170 cards (save 54% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
6 player type 1 total use 210 cards (save 37% time with "Default Rules"
6 player type 2 total use 156 cards (save 53% time with "Default Rules"
Thanks
Sorry to modify customized.
After I talk with other voting players, it may be revised as follows and it may not take more time.
imgur.com/ORu2M3U
all player need first turn for the "foresight" rule, last turn for "Jester".
3 player use "5 gap" add. (i.e. 1.6.11.16.20)
4 player use "4 gap" add. (i.e. 1.5.9.13.15)
5 player use "3 gap" add. (i.e. 1.4.7.10.12)
6 player use "2 gap" add. (i.e. 1.3.5.7.9.10) or (1.3.5.7.10)
3 player total use 162 cards (save 51% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
4 player total use 172 cards (save 53% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
5 player total use 170 cards (save 54% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
6 player type 1 total use 210 cards (save 37% time with "Default Rules"
6 player type 2 total use 156 cards (save 53% time with "Default Rules"
Thanks
MGoulet • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
18 jul 2021 20:16 • Thanks for the information.
For 6 players, maybe you should consider (1.3.5.8.10) = Total 162 or (1.3.6.8.10) = Total 168 (it's more in line with the others configurations.
I will rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
I'll add "Last 5 rounds" and for your configuration, i'll display "Special 5 rounds". Is that ok with you?
For 6 players, maybe you should consider (1.3.5.8.10) = Total 162 or (1.3.6.8.10) = Total 168 (it's more in line with the others configurations.
I will rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
I'll add "Last 5 rounds" and for your configuration, i'll display "Special 5 rounds". Is that ok with you?
abcdd2829 • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
19 jul 2021 6:23 • Hi MGoulet
I am confused to choose (1.3.5.8.10) or (1.3.6.8.10) or (1.3.5.7.9.10) or (1.3.5.7.10).
After talking about other voting players,keep time-consuming ideas.
Add thinking logic is as follows
It need has "few cards rounds" (some players may not have a specific color) and "many cards rounds" for skill play.
It is better to need "first round" and two "less card rounds" and two "many card rounds" and the last round.
3 player use 1.6.11.16.20 => 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards) not change time-consuming.
3 player use 1.5.9.13.15 => 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards) not change time-consuming.
5 player use 1.4.7.10.12 => 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
or
6 player use 1.3.6.8.10 (total use 168 cards).
If there are more players, more cards can be used because they can "pre-select cards" to save time.
So I think 1.2.3.7.9.10 (a total of 192 cards are used). It could be better.
imgur.com/KUg0S9S
red for "few cards rounds"
yellow for "many cards rounds"
==
I think need keep original "First 5 rounds" option for new player feel the game.
I think the "last 5 rounds" play a good play in skills.
I will play it in the actual game, but we take turns to play.
It is fair to every predicted player.
That is, 3 players play 3 rounds. 6 people play 6 rounds, no final round.
==
But I think we need to add "7 rounds" because it is fun and some voting players like it.
It's easy to play.
Thanks
I am confused to choose (1.3.5.8.10) or (1.3.6.8.10) or (1.3.5.7.9.10) or (1.3.5.7.10).
After talking about other voting players,keep time-consuming ideas.
Add thinking logic is as follows
It need has "few cards rounds" (some players may not have a specific color) and "many cards rounds" for skill play.
It is better to need "first round" and two "less card rounds" and two "many card rounds" and the last round.
3 player use 1.6.11.16.20 => 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards) not change time-consuming.
3 player use 1.5.9.13.15 => 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards) not change time-consuming.
5 player use 1.4.7.10.12 => 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
or
6 player use 1.3.6.8.10 (total use 168 cards).
If there are more players, more cards can be used because they can "pre-select cards" to save time.
So I think 1.2.3.7.9.10 (a total of 192 cards are used). It could be better.
imgur.com/KUg0S9S
red for "few cards rounds"
yellow for "many cards rounds"
==
I think need keep original "First 5 rounds" option for new player feel the game.
I think the "last 5 rounds" play a good play in skills.
I will play it in the actual game, but we take turns to play.
It is fair to every predicted player.
That is, 3 players play 3 rounds. 6 people play 6 rounds, no final round.
==
But I think we need to add "7 rounds" because it is fun and some voting players like it.
It's easy to play.
Thanks
MGoulet • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
19 jul 2021 14:02 • All your suggestion is 5 or 6 rounds, not 7 rounds =\
abcdd2829 • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
19 jul 2021 17:01 • Hi MGoulet
"7 rounds" is (1.2.3.4.5.6.7) for easily play option.
It is more depth than "first 5 rounds"
Thanks
"7 rounds" is (1.2.3.4.5.6.7) for easily play option.
It is more depth than "first 5 rounds"
Thanks
MGoulet • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
19 jul 2021 18:47 • Ok, so you want a 7 rounds + a special configuration in 5 rounds
abcdd2829 • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
20 jul 2021 6:09 • Hi MGoulet
Yes,
and you want add "last player rounds" or not?
3 players (17.18.19)
4 players (11.12.13.14)
5 players (7.8.9.10.11)
6 players (4.5.6.7.8.9)
Thanks
Yes,
and you want add "last player rounds" or not?
3 players (17.18.19)
4 players (11.12.13.14)
5 players (7.8.9.10.11)
6 players (4.5.6.7.8.9)
Thanks
abcdd2829 • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
20 jul 2021 7:13 • Hi MGoulet
Yes,
I want
A."7 rounds" (1.2.3.4.5.6.7)
B. "special configuration 6 rounds"
3 player use 1.6.11.16.20 => 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards) not change time-consuming.
4 player use 1.5.9.13.15 => 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards) not change time-consuming.
5 player use 1.4.7.10.12 => 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
and you want add "last player rounds" or not?
C. "last player rounds"
3 players (17.18.19)
4 players (11.12.13.14)
5 players (7.8.9.10.11)
6 players (4.5.6.7.8.9)
D. rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
Thanks
Yes,
I want
A."7 rounds" (1.2.3.4.5.6.7)
B. "special configuration 6 rounds"
3 player use 1.6.11.16.20 => 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards) not change time-consuming.
4 player use 1.5.9.13.15 => 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards) not change time-consuming.
5 player use 1.4.7.10.12 => 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
and you want add "last player rounds" or not?
C. "last player rounds"
3 players (17.18.19)
4 players (11.12.13.14)
5 players (7.8.9.10.11)
6 players (4.5.6.7.8.9)
D. rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
Thanks
abcdd2829 • Los desarrolladores están de acuerdo en que es una buena idea y tienen la intención de trabajar en ella:
21 jul 2021 12:54 •
23 jul 2021 3:18 •
23 jul 2021 9:03 • Hi MGoulet
so modify as follow
A."7 rounds" (1.2.3.4.5.6.7)
B. "special configuration 6 rounds"
3 player use 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards).
4 player use 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards).
5 player use 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
C. rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
D. others "last 5 rounds"?
Thanks
so modify as follow
A."7 rounds" (1.2.3.4.5.6.7)
B. "special configuration 6 rounds"
3 player use 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards).
4 player use 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards).
5 player use 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
C. rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
D. others "last 5 rounds"?
Thanks
Agregar a este informe
Por favor agrega aquí cualquier cosa que sea relevante para reproducir este error o entender tu sugerencia:
- Otro ID de partida / ID de jugada
- ¿Se resolvió el problema al pulsar F5?
- ¿Apareció el problema varias veces? ¿Cada vez? ¿Aleatoriamente?
- Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.