• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

During the end-game scoring, it's a nice idea to have it count up each card in sequence, but in reality it is hard to follow and I just end up looking at the score by the player names. I would find it much more helpful to have a simple chart instead.

It could have, say, 7 columns in a 2-player game. It could add points for player 1's 1st golem, player 2's 1st golem, player 1's 2nd golem, etc., and have points for remaining crystals in the last column. That way it adds interest as the scores climb and is easy to follow. If a player doesn't have enough golem cards to keep adding points, then the points are skipped in that column. I'm picturing something similar to the 7 Wonders Duel graphic on here.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?