• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?