• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?

• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.

I am not sure if it is a bug or intended by the developers.

We had a 4 players game. At some point (after 8 turns I believe) cards already used were avaliable again. Maybe this is intended to deal when the deck runs out, but such thing is not mentioned in the rule manual. Could you people check if it is a bug or a design?

If a design, maybe should be avoided? One of the strategies of the game is picking cards before the adversary, this way, they are just back? And if a design could add to the game description that once the evidence deck is over, cards are reshuffled. Thanks.

• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?