Todos los informes
Informes de Ark Nova
#88026: "Pilfer 2 took from one player twice instead of two"
notabug: Esto no es un error
2
¿Sobre qué es este informe?
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
Reglas: una regla del juego no ha sido respetada
Descripción detallada
• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?
It should have taken once from the player with the highest Appeal, and once from the player with highest Conservation. It took twice from the player with highest Conservation.• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?
Move 610• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v113
Historial de informes
6 may 2023 9:38 •
GTSchemer • Esto no es un error:
6 may 2023 17:32 • Greetings, did you check whether the opponent had Quarantine Lab, making them immune?
runtly • Esto no es un error:
6 may 2023 20:39 • They do, but it still should not have taken from the player who had the most conservation twice. The person playing the card had the 2nd most appeal, so there should not have been a target for the 2nd pilfer.
GTSchemer • Se necesita más información para que los desarrolladores puedan reproducir este error:
6 may 2023 22:17 • @runtly did you choose to gain appeal before or after executing the Pilfer effect?
We cannot reveal the full log to check until the game is done.
We cannot reveal the full log to check until the game is done.
runtly • Se necesita más información para que los desarrolladores puedan reproducir este error:
6 may 2023 23:42 • It wasn't me that played it, but from the images I posted on imgur it looks like no, appeal was not gained until after pilfer was played. I can't see the rest of the history right now, so it may have been that Percephony was lower before the card was played. Probably in that case, it wouldn't have been a bug. Thanks for taking the time to look into this.
GTSchemer • Se necesita más información para que los desarrolladores puedan reproducir este error:
7 may 2023 0:18 • Right, that's what I have to figure out.
GTSchemer • Se necesita más información para que los desarrolladores puedan reproducir este error:
14 may 2023 16:22 • We are reviewing the replay now.
Tisaac • Esto no es un error:
22 may 2023 21:48 • At the moment of Pilfering, Percephony had 7 conservation and 38 appeal.
Daylighter had 7 conservation, 40 appeal.
Duggo had 5 an 51 with Quarantine lab.
Runtly had 5 and 37.
Everything seems good here.
Daylighter had 7 conservation, 40 appeal.
Duggo had 5 an 51 with Quarantine lab.
Runtly had 5 and 37.
Everything seems good here.
GTSchemer • Esto no es un error:
22 may 2023 22:33 • It seems the replay didn't necessarily show correct values for some counters, but the math adds up.
Agregar a este informe
Por favor agrega aquí cualquier cosa que sea relevante para reproducir este error o entender tu sugerencia:
- Otro ID de partida / ID de jugada
- ¿Se resolvió el problema al pulsar F5?
- ¿Apareció el problema varias veces? ¿Cada vez? ¿Aleatoriamente?
- Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.