#9837: "When using the investigator, it sometimes gives false information. "
¿Sobre qué es este informe?
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
¿Qué ha pasado? Por favor, selecciona una de las opciones siguientes
Por favor, comprueba si ya hay un informe sobre el mismo tema
Si es así, por favor VOTA por este informe. ¡A los informes con más votos se les da PRIORIDAD!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descripción detallada
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el mensaje de error que ves en tu pantalla, si hay alguno.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• Por favor, explica lo que querías hacer, lo que hiciste y lo que pasó
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• ¿Qué había en la pantalla cuando se quedó bloqueado? (¿mensaje de error?, ¿pantalla en blanco?, ¿una parte de la interfaz del juego?)
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• ¿Qué parte de las reglas no se ha respetado en la adaptación de BGA?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• ¿La infracción de las reglas es visible en la repetición de la partida? Si es así, ¿en qué jugada?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• ¿Qué acción de juego querías realizar?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• ¿Qué es lo que trataste de hacer para activar esta acción del juego?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. -
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando lo hiciste (el mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• ¿En qué etapa de la partida ocurrió el problema? ¿Cuál era la instrucción actual del juego?
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• ¿Qué sucedió cuando trataste de hacer una acción de juego (mensaje de error, mensaje en la barra de estado del juego, ...)?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Por favor, describe el problema de visualización. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Por favor, copia/pega el texto mostrado en inglés en lugar de en tu idioma. Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
-
• ¿Está este texto disponible en el sistema de traducción? Si es así, ¿ha sido traducido hace más de 24 horas?
Move #32 when lachimi put the investigator on Rick's Cafe. It showed him 1 match 0 adjacent. However he actually had China Town,Police Corruption,Pop. Police Corruption was on Rick's Cafe and Pop was adjacent so it should have said 1 match 1 adjacent.
In the most blatant case was move 114 where Pseudo first used a downtown evidence card which showed him 1 adjacent. Then he put an investigator there and it showed him no matches...
This glitch has caused serious confusion and frustration, hopefully it can be fixed ASAP. • ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
-
• Por favor explica tu sugerencia de manera precisa y concisa para que sea lo más fácil posible entender lo que quieres decir.
Investigator gave false information regarding what was adjacent.
• ¿Qué navegador estás usando?
Google Chrome v66
Historial de informes
I think I understand why it's making that mistake, nonetheless it's a serious bug and right now I am asking all of my opponents to verify my information as well as their own to prevent suffering from the glitch.
So, to improve the wording of the game log, I see two options:
1. "$player sent an investigator to $location. *New* matches: ...."
2. "$player sent an investigator to $location. Matches: $correctnumber"
If I go for 2., would it confuse players if it says, e.g. "matches: 1 exact, 1 adjacent" an then only 1 token appears on the investigator tile, because the other token is already on the aspect tile? Obviously moving the token from a tile to the investigator is not an option as this would reduce the amount information again (which doesn't make sense).
would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube.“
So, if going by that, one could argue that the game log should as closely as possible imitate a real player, then the log should say something like: “Place 1 disc onto the investigator.”, really only talking about the new tokens.
“$player‘s investigator finds new information at $location: X disc(s), Y cube(s).”
#55
The answer is China Town, Knuckles, Bank job.
and I put my investigator on China Town square, which is neighbor of both Knuckles and Bank Job(there's a disc on Bank job). The right info should be "1 disc, 2 cubes", but it only shows "1 disc, 1 cube".
#77
The answer is Doc, Trocadero, Jewellery Heist
I put my investigator on the square below Jewellery Heist(already had a disc on it), which is not neighbor others, but this time I got a cube, indicated "Jewellery Heist".
"If you already have discs and/or cubes in the location then these would be taken into consideration by the player holding the Case cards, making sure that a specific tile did not receive another disc or cube."
On #40141874 #55
I already got a cube on that location and it's should be take into consideration, no duplicate info should given by investigator.
Is there a way to make it more visually obvious when this happens? Perhaps animate the cube moving from the location to the investigator then back to the location?
Agregar a este informe
- Otro ID de partida / ID de jugada
- ¿Se resolvió el problema al pulsar F5?
- ¿Apareció el problema varias veces? ¿Cada vez? ¿Aleatoriamente?
- Si tienes una captura de este error (buena práctica), puedes usar Imgur.com para subirla y copiar/pegar el enlace aquí.
